SolveigMM End-User Products > Beta Testing
SolveigMM Video Splitter 1.1 Beta (WMV/ASF support)
g@rfield:
When I talk about PageUp / Page Down, I do mean navigatation though certain number of frames (it would be better to be adjustable in settings\options).
The usability of such feature is obvious, when you need to make cuts in a small range of non-sequencial frames (eg when you need to remove from a clip
the following frames 121-129, 154-185, 253-352, 391-542...)
What do you mean by saying "the part of movie the slider has to jump over should be adjustable" ?
I want to select specific frame start / end for each range & this to be made easy by keyboard shortcuts (not mouse-only).
Dmitry Vergeles:
--- Quote from: "g@rfield" ---In the keyboard shortcuts list, I would add and PageUp\PageDown for many K frames movement (forwards\backwards) or at least a combination (Shift + Arrow)..
I believe that if the next version of Video Splitter makes all these features true & (most of all) keeps the LIGHTNING spees of it, your product will be the best possible AVI editor, simple, fast & just-do-it!
PS: Because I'm a marketing consultant, you might have to "push" your product (SolveigMM Video Splitter) a little bit in advertising in cyberspace, so that everyone will know what it can do & (mostly) how FAST it can do it... Say, "try to find a faster AVI editor... you won't!"
--- End quote ---
First of all thank you for the promotion suggestion :D
You talk about PageUp / Page Down, you mean upon these calls the program should navigate not to a next K frame but though certain number.
Could you explain from a user point of view a usability of such a feature?
And do you want the part of movie the slider has to jump over should be adjustable?
g@rfield:
In the keyboard shortcuts list, I would add and PageUp\PageDown for many K frames movement (forwards\backwards) or at least a combination (Shift + Arrow)..
I believe that if the next version of Video Splitter makes all these features true & (most of all) keeps the LIGHTNING spees of it, your product will be the best possible AVI editor, simple, fast & just-do-it!
PS: Because I'm a marketing consultant, you might have to "push" your product (SolveigMM Video Splitter) a little bit in advertising in cyberspace, so that everyone will know what it can do & (mostly) how FAST it can do it... Say, "try to find a faster AVI editor... you won't!"
Dmitry Vergeles:
We are remember that you have already asked as abut this feature
--- Quote ---There are no keys for frame-by-frame movement (or at least - if not keys - mouse wheel!). This is a big trouble for me, since I cannot make a down-to-1-frame-specification! This means low precision in cuttings... (my previous software - TMPGEnc XPress - has already this feature - give it a look)
--- End quote ---
In reality this is not the problem to add frame accuracy navigation.
But as you probably know the Video Splitter performs trimming task with K frame accuracy.
That means whatever frame in a video fragment you navigate an output (trimmed) fragment will be started with a K Frame.
By the way you can navigate by K Frames with Left/Right arrows
The full chortcut schedule is as follows:
--- Quote ---Next K frame - Right arrow
Previous K frame - Left arrow
Play/Pause - Space
Set new marker - Ctrl + M
Remove marker - Delete
Clear all markers - Ctrl + C
Select fragment - Ctrl + S
Invert timeline - Ctrl + I
Start splitting process - Ctrl + T
--- End quote ---
Nevertheless we have got a user feedback that such a frame navigation would be handy even with K frame accuracy trimming.
So do you think so?
Now about a frame accuracy trimming feature. We are going to implement this feature. I suppose it will be added to Video Splitter within one or two months.
[/url]
g@rfield:
Is there any possibility in the future to include the "keyboard support" in SolveigMM Video Splitter?
When I say keyboard support, I mean to make use of arrow keys, PageUp\Down... to make selection of frames easier & more accurate...
The true is that by mouse, the accuracy is... simply 0!
Also, is there any way to increase the selection's accuracy down to frame-level?
Where do you think that the new version (that will include these features) will be available? More\less...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version